登录 注册

You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore

去点 Star
其他 alternativeseslint-pluginfindindexhacktoberfestisnanjavascript
19,113
Stars
814
Forks
193
Watchers
63
Open Issues
MIT
许可证
JavaScript
语言
2016-01-26
创建时间
2026-10-17
最近更新

项目能做什么

列出无需 Lodash/Underscore 的原生 JavaScript 方法清单,并提供配套 ESLint 插件。
来源:基于仓库元数据 · 内容以仓库实际 README 为准

使用说明 查看原始 README 原仓库文档

中文使用说明暂未生成。下面保留原仓库 README 摘录,命令与配置均以原文为准。
原始 README 摘录(英文原文,节选前 3000 字符)
# [You don't (may not) need Lodash/Underscore](https://you-dont-need.github.io/You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore/#/)

[![Join the community on Spectrum](https://withspectrum.github.io/badge/badge.svg)](https://spectrum.chat/you-dont-need/lodash-underscore)
[![Gitter](https://badges.gitter.im/Join%20Chat.svg)](https://gitter.im/cht8687/You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore)

Lodash and Underscore are great modern JavaScript utility libraries, and they are widely used by Front-end developers. However, when you are targeting modern browsers, you may find out that there are many methods which are already supported natively thanks to ECMAScript5 [ES5] and ECMAScript2015 [ES6]. If you want your project to require fewer dependencies, and you know your target browser clearly, then you may not need Lodash/Underscore.

You are welcome to contribute with more items provided below.

* If you are targeting legacy JavaScript engine with those ES5 methods, you can use [es5-shim](https://github.com/es-shims/es5-shim)

* Please note that, the examples used below are just showing you the native alternative of performing certain tasks. For some functions, Lodash provides you more options than native built-ins. This list is not a 1:1 comparison.

* Please send a PR if you want to add or modify the code. No need to open an issue unless it's something big and you want to discuss.


## Voice of Developers

> [Make use of native JavaScript object and array utilities before going big.](https://twitter.com/codylindley/status/692356631007342593)

> &mdash;<cite>Cody Lindley, Author of [jQuery Cookbook](http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596159788.do) and [JavaScript Enlightenment](http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920027713.do)</cite>

<!-- -->
> [You probably don't need Lodash. Nice List of JavaScript methods which you can use natively.](https://twitter.com/daniellmb/status/692200768556916740)

> &mdash;<cite>Daniel Lamb, Computer Scientist, Technical Reviewer of [Secrets of the JavaScript Ninja](https://www.manning.com/books/secrets-of-the-javascript-ninja-second-edition) and [Functional Programming in JavaScript](https://www.manning.com/books/functional-programming-in-javascript)</cite>

<!-- -->
> [I guess not, but I want it.](https://twitter.com/teropa/status/692280179666898944)

> &mdash;<cite>Tero Parviainen, Author of [build-your-own-angular](http://teropa.info/build-your-own-angular)</cite>

<!-- -->
> [I'll admit, I've been guilty of overusing #lodash. Excellent resource.](https://twitter.com/therebelrobot/status/692907269512642561)

> &mdash;<cite>@therebelrobot, Maker of web things, Facilitator for Node.js/io.js</cite>


## ESLint Plugin

<div align="center">

[![NPM Version](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/eslint-plugin-you-dont-need-lodash-underscore.svg?style=flat-square)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-you-dont-need-lodash-underscore)
[![Downloads](http://img.shields.io/npm/dm/eslint-plugin-you-dont-need-lodash-underscore.svg?style=flat-square)](https:
阅读完整原文

项目深度分析 规则生成(AI 未配置)

综合评分 62.1 分。该项目在“个人可实施性”维度得 55 分,“付费可能性”维度得 40.0 分,差异化空间 100.0 分(评分依据见评分卡)。

将 You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore 改造为垂直场景 SaaS

产品构想保留核心能力,针对某一类用户(如某行业团队)做托管版,收取月费。
目标用户有该需求的中小团队 / 独立站长
难度/周期中 · 2~4 周(MVP)
收费模式订阅制(如 ¥29~99/月)
竞争风险需验证付费意愿;注意许可证合规
依据 数据支持的判断:许可证与关键词显示存在商用与付费场景

面向细分需求的二次开发产品

产品构想基于 You-Dont-Need-Lodash-Underscore 的核心能力,聚焦一个更窄的场景(如某平台、某行业)做差异化。
目标用户该细分场景用户
难度/周期中 · 2~6 周
收费模式买断制 / 订阅制 / 广告
竞争风险细分需求规模需验证
依据 AI 推测:基于项目主题标签的判断

封装为在线小工具或 API 服务

产品构想把项目最常用的一个功能做成网页小工具,靠流量变现或按量计费。
目标用户搜索引擎带来的长尾用户
难度/周期低 · 1~3 周
收费模式免费引流 + 增值功能 / API 按量计费
竞争风险同质化竞争,需做好 SEO
依据 AI 推测:基于技术栈与部署特征的判断
以上为规则引擎基于仓库公开数据生成的参考结论,包含推测成分,不构成投资或创业承诺;配置 AI 后可获得更深入的分析。
报告会保存到 个人中心

竞品与相似项目 GitHub Search 真实检索

相似项目数据正在完善中,暂不展示(避免误导)

项目优势与风险

技术成熟度创建于 2016-01-26,近 30 天仍在推送,发布过 2 个 Release
社区活跃Star 19,113 / Fork 814 / Issue 63(数据支持,可自行核实)
许可证MIT
主要风险上游项目方向可能变化;同赛道竞争者较多(见竞品表);热度与需求不完全等价

安装与使用

此项目未提供 Docker 镜像,安装步骤以原仓库 README 为准(涉及依赖安装与环境配置,对新手门槛较高)。